Mapeando as pesquisas no domínio teórico da Arquitetura da Paisagem entre 1965 e 2018

Autores

  • Ariel Pinto Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, UFMS, Campo Grande, MS
  • Eliane Guaraldo Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, MS, Brasil

Palavras-chave:

Teoria Substantiva, Cientometria, Serviços Ecossistêmicos, Contribuições da Natureza

Resumo

Pretendeu-se analisar como a Arquitetura da Paisagem, enquanto campo da ciência, reúne produções e perspectivas inovadoras ao pensamento e prática do tratamento da paisagem. Empregada inicialmente para diagnosticar e descrever a estrutura da paisagem, atualmente, tornou-se um campo de pesquisa integrado na abordagem das diversas questões ambientais e de sociodiversidade. Para representar a estrutura de conhecimento e a evolução da Arquitetura da Paisagem foram utilizados os softwares de análise CiteSpace e VOSviewer, que apontaram a insurgência de questões relativas a Serviços Ecossistêmicos, o que desencadeia novos debates sobre o planejamento e gerenciamento da paisagem.

Referências

ALPAK, E.M.; OZKAN, D, G., DUZENLI, T. (2018) Systems approach in landscape design: a studio work. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. V. 2, p. 593-611.

ALBRECHT, C. (2018) A systemic approach for integrative design of buildings and landscapes: towards ecosystem services provision in urban areas, Pennsylvania.

ARTAXO, P. (2014) Uma nova era geológica em nosso planeta: o antropoceno. Revista USP, São Paulo, v. 103, p.13-24.

ARNOLD, CL.; GIBBONS, CJ. (1996) Impervious surface coverage - The emergence of key environmental indicator. Journal of the American Planning Assosciation, v.62 (2), p. 243-258.

BHARATDWAJ, K. (2009) Physical Geography: a landscape appreciations, Seachin Printers, Delhi.

BOWLER, D. E.; BUYUNG-ALI, L. M.; KNIGHT, T. M.; PULLIN, A. S. (2010) A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural enrironments. Public Health, v. 10, p. 456.

CHEN, C. (2004) Searching for intelectual points: prograssive knowledg domain visualization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), v.101, 5303-5310.

CHEN, C. (2006) CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transiente patterns in scientific literature. Journal of American Society for information Science and technology, v.57 (3), p. 359-377.

CHEN, C. (2017) Science Mapping: a sistematic review of the literature.Journal of Data and Information Science, v. 2 (2), p. 1-40.

COMISSÃO MUNDIAL SOBRE MEIO AMBIENTE E DESENVOLVIMENTO – CMMAD (1988) Nosso Futuro Comum. Instituto de Documentação – Editora da Fundação Getúlio Varga, Rio de Janeiro.

COSTANZA, R.; D'ARGE, R.; de GROOT, R.; FARBERK, S.; GRASSO, M.; HANNON, B., et al. (1997) The Value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, v. 387, p. 253-260.

DANIEL, T. C.; MUHAR, A.; ARNBERGER, A.; AZNAR, O.; (2012) Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 109, p. 8812-8819.

De GROOT, RS.; ALKEMADE, R.; BRAAT, L.; HEIN, L. (2010) Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decidion making. Ecological Complexity, v. 7 (3), p. 260-272.

EGGHE, L. (2006) Theory and practice of the g-index. Scientometrics, v. 69 (1), p. 131-152.

FISCHER, B.; COZTANZA, R.; TURNER, R. K.; MORLING, P. (2009) Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics, v. 68 (3), p. 643-653.

GARDNER, TOBY A. BARLOW, JOS. CHAZDON, R. EWERS, ROBERT M. HARVEY, CELIA A. PERES, CARLOS A. SODHI, NAVJOT S. (2009) Prospects for tropical forest biodiversity in a human-modified world. Ecology Letters, v12 (6), p. 561-582.

GOBSTER, P.H.; NASSAUER, J.I.; DANIEL, T.C.; FRY, G. (2007) The shared landscape: what does aesthetics have to do with ecology? Landscape Ecology, v. 22, p. 959-972.

GUSTAFSON, E. J.; CROW, T. R. (1998) Simulating Spatial and Temporal Context of Forest Management Using Hypothetical Landscapes. Environmental Management, v. 22, p. 777-787.

HEWITT, Robert; NASSAR, Hala. (2012) Finding Multi-centers: using crowd-sourcing Technologies to define communities of landscape architecture, CELA.

HICKS, Diana; WOUTERS, Paul; WALTMAN, Ludo; RIJCKE, Sarah; RAFOLS, Ismael. (2015) Manifesto de Leiden sobre métricas de pesquisa. Nature, v.520, p. 429-431.

HOUGH, Michael (1995) Naturaleza y ciudad: planificación urbana y processos ecológicos. Gustavo Gili, Barcelona.

KAJIKAWA, Y., OHNO, J., TAKEDA, Y., MATSUSHIMA, K., KOMIYAMA, H. (2007) Creating na academic landscape of sustainability Science: na analysis of the citation network. Sustainability Science, v. 2, p. 221-231.

Kaplan, S. (1995) The restorative benefits of nature: toward na integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, v. 15, p. 169-182.

LILY, John T. (1999) Design for human ecosystems: landscape, land use and natural resources. Island Press, Washggton, DC.

McCarthy, J. (2010) Blended learning environmets: using social networking sites to enhance the first-year experience. Australian Journal of Educational Technology. v. 6, p. 729-740.

MCHARG, Ian L. (1967) Proyectar com la Naturaleza. Gustavo Gilli, As, Barcelona.
MURPHY, Michael D. (2016) Landscape Architecture Theory: na ecological approach. Island Press, Washiggton, DC.

PLIENINGER, T.; DIJKS, S.; OTEROS-ROZAS, E.; BIELING, C. (2013) Assesing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy, v. 33, p. 112-129.

SPINAK, Ernesto. Indicadores Cientométricos. Ci Inf., Brasília, v.27, n.2, p. 141-148, maio/ago. Disponível em < http://www.scielo.br/pdf/ci/v27n2/2729806.pdf> Acesso em maio de 2018.

SPIRN, Anne W. (1947) O jardim de granito: a natureza no desenho da cidade. Tradução: Paulo Renato Mesquita Pellegrino. Edusp, São Paulo.

SANTOS, Raimundo N. M.; KOBASHI, Nair Y. (2009) Bibliometria, Cientometria, Infometria: conceitos e aplicações. Pesquisa Brasileira em Ciência da Informação, Brasília, v.2, n.1, p. 155-172. Disponível em <http://www.brapci.inf.br/index.php/article/view/0000007766/> Acesso em fevereiro de 2019.

SAURA, S.; PASCUAL-HORTAL, L. (2007) A new habitat availability index to integrate connectivity in landscape conservation planning: comparison with existing indices and application to a case study. Landscape and Urban Planning, v.83 (2,3), p. 91-103.

SCHENK, Luciana B. M. (2008) Arquitetura da Paisagem: entre o Pinturesco, Olmsted e o Moderno, São Carlos.

TERMORSHUIZEN, J. W.; OPDAM, P. (2009) Landscape Services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development. Landscape Ecology, v. 24, p. 1037-1052.

TRESS, B.; TRESS, G. (2003) Scenario visualization for participatory landscape planning - a study from Denmark. Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 64, p. 161-178.

WU, J. (2013) Landscape Sustainability science: ecosystem services and human well-being changing landscapes. Landscape Ecology, v.28, p. 999-1023.

ULRICH, R. (1984) View through a window may influence recovery from surfery. Science, v. 224, p. 420-421.

UEEMAA, E. M.; ÜLO MARJA, R. (2013) Trends in the use of landscape spatial metrics as landscape indicators: a review. Ecological Indicators.

VAZ, C.E.; CELANI, M.G.C.; DUARTE, J.M.P. (2011) An ontology representing Roberto Burle Marx’s landscape design solutions. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia. p. 389-398.

ZHU, Jie; HUA, Weijian. (2017) Visualizing the knowledge domain of sustainable development research between 1987 and 2015: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, v.110, p. 893-914.

Downloads

Publicado

2022-02-16

Como Citar

PINTO, A.; GUARALDO, E. Mapeando as pesquisas no domínio teórico da Arquitetura da Paisagem entre 1965 e 2018. Terr@ Plural, [S. l.], v. 16, p. 1–24, 2022. Disponível em: https://revistas2.uepg.br/index.php/tp/article/view/17336. Acesso em: 29 maio. 2022.

Edição

Seção

Artigos